BLOG

Growth obligation: JPMorgan Chase vs GLS Bank

Lotte-Marie Brouwer

Can your business model function without constant annual growth?

 

 

Business as Usual is structurally forced to grow

JPMorgan Chase

JPMorgan Chase operates as a publicly listed bank with external shareholders who expect consistent financial returns. This creates structural pressure on management to continuously increase profits, dividends, and market share. Growth is not optional, but it is embedded in the logic of the model, as stagnation can lead to declining stock valuation and investor dissatisfaction.

To meet these expectations, the bank must keep expanding its activities, whether through increased lending, larger trading volumes, or entering new international markets. This expansion is reinforced by competition within the financial sector, where scale and growth are key to maintaining relevance and profitability. As a result, the system incentivizes continuous growth which is always linked to energy and material use, which puts pressure on our planet's systems.

This illustrates a broader pattern among shareholder-driven corporations: the need for perpetual growth is not just strategic, but systemic. Even if leadership wanted to stabilize or slow growth, the expectations of capital markets make it difficult to do so without negative financial consequences.

 

Future Entrepreneurs limit growth and place the mission at the center

GLS Bank

GLS Bank represents a fundamentally different approach. As a German ethical cooperative bank, its capital is provided by members who prioritize social and ecological impact over maximizing financial returns. This changes the core incentive structure: growth becomes a means, not an end.

Because returns are intentionally limited and governance is democratic, the bank is not under pressure to pursue aggressive expansion. Instead, it focuses on allocating capital in alignment with its mission, such as financing sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, and social initiatives. Growth is managed carefully to ensure it does not compromise these goals.

In this model, the absence of growth pressure allows for long-term thinking and stability. The bank can choose to grow only when it strengthens its mission, rather than because external investors demand it. This demonstrates that financial institutions can operate sustainably without being locked into a cycle of constant expansion.

 

What you can do

If you want to handle growth like a Future Entrepreneur here are some practical tips:

  • Choose the right ownership structure: Consider cooperative models, steward ownership, or mission-locked governance to reduce pressure from external investors demanding continuous growth.
  • Redefine success metrics: Track impact, customer value, and resilience alongside (or instead of) revenue growth to avoid growth becoming the only goal.
  • Cap returns or reinvest profits: Limit dividend payouts or reinvest earnings into the mission, reducing the need to scale purely for financial performance.
Back to blog

This blog is part of the Future Entrepreneur Game

The Future Entrepreneur Game is a hands-on card game that challenges you to rethink the script of Business as Usual within your own organization.

Through 32 real-world examples, the game helps you reflect on your own organization's governance, finance, operations and marketing and empowers you to take action.

Ideal for workshops, team sessions, and changemakers who are ready to redesign
their organization for a future worth living in.

Available in English and in Dutch.

Email LM@future-entrepreneur.com to request a workshop.